Monday, 28 November 2016

Criteria D - Evaluating the solution

Criteria D- Evaluating the Solution 

Self -evaluation against Design Specification 

Design 1- Toy -friendly syringe 
Design 2 - Jean straps
Design 3- Water bottle fabric case

Peer Evaluation Against Design Specification:


TASK 3:

Design 1-Friendly Syringe:

I think my toy friendly robot is a good idea but I think the toy itself can get contaminated easily from the children so the toy would be even better if there was some sort of way that the toy can get cleaned without damaging any part of it. The toy would be even better if the design would be improved because of the limit of shapes that are placed in Tinkercad.

Design 2-Pant Straps:

The Pant Straps are a very effective design if the target audience was to buy it but the design that was made from Tinkercad was a bit plain. Because the  limit of geometric shapes in tinkered isn't a lot , there were not too many extra features I could have added in the design. The design itself was just regular pants(without pockets) and the jean straps. The design, however, could have been improved by adding features such as pockets to make the design look helpful. 

Design 3-Water bottle fabric case:

I think that the water bottle fabric case was designed nearly exactly sketched so the improvements wouldn't be too much if there were any, The water bottle cover could be improved if the colors were changed or a number of colors to the cover were added.

No comments:

Post a Comment